By Calvin Tuttle
In 2015, Elon Musk guessed that the industry should expect fully autonomous vehicles by 2018—that never happened. In 2014, Nissan promised multiple, commercially-viable driverless vehicles on the market by 2020. While the COVID-19 pandemic did not help the situation, this is another unmet promise. Why do auto manufacturers have to keep moving the goalposts on driverless vehicles? According to a research paper recently published in Nature Communications by Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (CCAT) Director and Civil and Environmental Engineering Professor at the University of Michigan, Dr. Henry Liu, one of the obstacles that has hindered the development of autonomous vehicles comes down to a severe inefficiency in the way autonomous vehicle testing and evaluation is performed.
The buzz surrounding autonomous vehicles (AVs) is multi-faceted, but can mostly be attributed to a significant decrease in traffic fatalities and the possibility of providing greater access to education, healthcare, and job opportunities to underserved communities. For this technology to be widely adopted, it must be proven safe by undergoing a series of rigorous tests to evaluate its intelligence in comparison to a human driver. Unfortunately, there is no known standard test to evaluate the readiness of an AV. Currently, state-of-the-art testing combines software simulation, closed-track testing, and on-road testing.
The issue with most of the simulation software and test tracks available is that, because events of interest (including accidents) rarely happen, they might require hundreds of millions (sometimes billions) of miles driven to demonstrate safety performance. To date, Waymo has only simulated 15 billion miles in total. Scenario-based testing has been used in practice, where corner cases are designed by safety experts or collected from on-road testing and are replayed to examine an AV’s response. However, these scenarios are distinct and impossible to list. Typically, they only involve simple maneuvers, a small number of vehicles, and short driving times. Work conducted by Dr. Liu and his team aims to construct a naturalistic and adversarial driving environment (NADE), hoping to overcome the above obstacles and improve the efficiency of closed-track and simulation testing/evaluation.
Dr. Liu’s simulated driving environment is constructed using large-scale naturalistic driving data that was collected by the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI). By training background vehicles to learn when to executive certain adversarial maneuvers, while simultaneously keeping most of the driving environment naturalistic, the newly proposed testing method ensures unbiasedness and improves efficiency. In contrast to scenario-based approaches, NADE is continuous, allowing for uninterrupted interaction between AVs and multiple background vehicles. For example, if a researcher wants to test their vehicle in an urban environment, this approach would allow the testing AV to drive continuously and experience adversarial scenarios including cut-ins and hard braking events at higher rates. The results show that this environment eliminates the inefficiency of the currently available options by multiple orders of magnitude. It is expected that this approach can accelerate the deployment of autonomous vehicles.
The methodology proposed by this paper along with Dr. Liu’s augmented reality test environment will be implemented at the American Center for Mobility (ACM) in 2021. Founded in 2016, the American Center for Mobility is a smart city test center located on over 500 acres at the historic Willow Run site in Ypsilanti, MI. ACM is a collaborative effort comprised of government, industry, and academic organizations focused on accelerating the mobility industry through research, testing, standards development, and educational programming. This partnership aims to make southeast Michigan the preeminent location for autonomous vehicle testing and validation. “Driving one mile at ACM using augmented reality simulation with NADE superimposed on our track could be equal to hundreds or thousands of public road miles leading to dramatically lower overall cost and lead-times to validate AVs in a safer, controlled, repeatable test environment. ACM sees this as a significant product development resource and enabler for AV developers,” said President and CEO of ACM, Reuben Sarkar.
The paper associated with this research was recently published in Nature Communications, a peer-reviewed, open access, scientific journal. It is multidisciplinary in nature and covers the natural sciences including physics, chemistry, earth sciences, medicine, and biology. Interested readers can access the paper online. This research was conducted under the Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (CCAT), the Region 5 USDOT University Transportation Center.
This article was originally published by the Center for Connected and Automated Transportation (CCAT) at the University of Michigan. Read the original article.